Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Pedantic nitpick: it's not the dumbest possible multiplication; it's the dumbest possible bilinear multiplication. There are "freer" free products on vectors than tensor product; the freest possible one is their Cartesian product as sets, which just makes a tuple out of them ij = (i, j). If you regarded the resulting sets as a vector space, it would not be true that i0 + 0j = (i, 0) + (0, j) ≠ (i, j). The tensor product is the freest that is well-behaved as a vector space in the sense that it respects the underlying scalar operations from its arguments.


my point was merely that in most cases where "universal object" is used, it could be replaced with "dumbest object such that".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: