Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sure and anyone who has worked in a toxic workplace knows exactly what it means to require a direct path to leadership to resolve an issue instead of just resolving it.


I also notice he conditions it on "any former employee." What about current employees who may be affected by the same legalese?

Either way, I can imagine a subtext of "step forward and get a target on your back."


Current employees rarely sign exit agreements, since by exiting they stop being employees.


True, they can't renegotiate agreements that don't yet exist.

However the fact that the corporate leadership could even make those threats to not-yet-departed employees indicates that something is already broken or missing in the legal relationship with current ones.

A simple example might for the company to clearly state in their handbook--for all current employees--that vested shares cannot be clawed back.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: