Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That prototype/demonstrator (let's not get silly about words here) looks like it's actually flying properly though. Transitions to horizontal and vertical flights and all. They are planning to have the first manned flight end of this year. A scam would be intentionally misleading people about the ability of this thing to fly at all and then grabbing the money and run.

scam would also involve disgruntled investors trying to sue and getting their money back. There have been a few such cases about investors wanting their money back. But the headline is that Lilium is continuing to raise lots of money and making steady progress to getting their products launched. And those court cases seem to be going nowhere so far. The nature of VC funding is of course that things don't always go to plan.

Just because this company isn't satisfying your need for instant success and instead is following an entirely reasonable path to certification, which is slow for any airplane, doesn't mean it's a scam. By that logic anything is a scam until it emerges fully designed and manufactured on the market. That's not how things work in the real world.

This thing has investors, prospective customers with letters of intent, and flying prototypes.

Nikola is actually shipping trucks at this point too. Yes, they got caught with a non driving prototype running downhill and they got punished for that and the CEO might do some jail time for that. But the thing works now and they are selling lots of trucks that actually move cargo around. A scam would have been if the thing proved to be vapor ware. As it turns out, it wasn't. It was just running a bit late.



>A scam would be intentionally misleading people about the ability of this thing to fly at all and then grabbing the money and run.

There's a fine line between a scam and a business plan which bakes in assumptions that are unrealistic.


I haven't been following those, but the GP's question wasn't about any of the things you enumerated.

The big question is: have they demonstrate a loaded plane flying through a useful distance while keeping enough reserve energy for satisfying the safety requirements?

Their videos are very well produced explanations about everything but this. There's some stuff about a few changes that reduce the reserve requirements, but still, I couldn't find anything about range.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: