Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The same argument could be made in the other direction though. More, but worse, coverage could lead to behavioral changes that result in worse outcomes. Specifically, people feel more confident and go swimming when normally they'd only do so in lifeguarded waters.

Really we need to wait and see what the data shows (if they review it), as the article states for now they haven't performed any rescues.



I really doubt that right now, anyone is going swimming when they wouldn't have otherwise because they think a drone will rescue them.

Maybe many years from now when drone rescues become commonplace. But it's not exactly something to worry about at the moment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: