Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's a moral argument. In the west we believe liberal values are the best , and we want them around the world. As such, authoritarianism is a priori an enemy


So destabilizing and destroying a country for the sake of establishing liberal values is a morally righteous decision?


There's exactly one country (Japan) where establishing a liberal democracy at gunpoint worked out. The US then tried to do the same in like a quarter of the world and kept failing. At some point some people up there ought to get the message right? I don't know how else to do it but war simply isn't it.


being "an enemy" doesn't imply that we attack them


You called China an enemy in response to Schmidt being called a war mongerer. I read that as a defense of Schmidt stance and implicit support for war with China. If I got that wrong then I agree my comment is out of context.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: