OK? Someone said what about apps that only run on Linux, you mentioned you run them in a linux jail.

I like the BSD, mainly Net, but I don't try to force them to be a desktop OS when they are not suited for that, and so don't try running Linux stuff under them.

Besides, even it's it's an emulation layer, you're still basically running the linux userland, and we both know the FreeBSD kernel isn't significantly different or better for most desktop uses.

> Since you know best what makes sense (by not knowing what FreeBSD even can and the difference between emulation and translation) perfect self-report.

Oh, I'm perfectly familiar with FreeBSD. I just don't try and use it as a desktop OS for the sake of being different. You might like it just fine, and maybe you're doing some tinkering with something BSD adjacent so it makes sense to run it. But objectively for most users and cases, it's the inferior option for desktop computing.

You're here trying to argue it's as good or better than Linux, if I haven't misunderstood your position, and I don't think that's something you can support at all. You can give up if you like, but it won't be because I thought linux support on FreeBSD was more than an emulation layer, it will be because you can't support your position.

How's 802.11ax and 802.11av support? Bluetooth work fine? Realtime audio multiplexing? What if you want to run a newer game and the FreeBSD version of Wine hasn't backported enough support yet?

There's so many apps and hardware that won't work well on FreeBSD, or won't work at all, because making it work isn't a priority of the project. That's just a fact.