useful line of thinking here.. this approach also reveals a fundamental part of negotiations.. are people interested in seeing an approach? and willing to put up with small failures and setbacks to get to a desired approach? ask that for both sides. call them "automators" .. those who want more robots, all the time, at any cost(?) due to the bright and shiny robot future they make.. and/or the "john henry"s so to speak.. humans and their allies.. people who make a living, have property and are part of families, schools and communities.. elect representatives into social groups that have a seat at the table.. long-term humans that live and thrive
On another hand, pure "economic determinism" about efficiency and quarterly results, that is included in this topic.. but some might say that those economic determinism people have a lot to answer for in an age of inappropriately priced fossil fuels, availability of credit in large amounts for unequal reasons, a system of law and associated prices that assume an infinite natural world to use up in any way, shape or form. etc.
On another hand, pure "economic determinism" about efficiency and quarterly results, that is included in this topic.. but some might say that those economic determinism people have a lot to answer for in an age of inappropriately priced fossil fuels, availability of credit in large amounts for unequal reasons, a system of law and associated prices that assume an infinite natural world to use up in any way, shape or form. etc.