There's obvious parody (which the original campaign kind of skirts at the edge of), and there's outright impersonation.
A reasonable person should be able to tell the roast from the real deal - the original website was at the very edge of it, the Twitter account is right off the cliff.
I'm only using Ghostery, I wouldn't expect that to affect the main content of a site.
Ghostery's blocked list:
DoubleClick
Facebook Connect
Google +1
Google Adsense
Google Analytics
LinkedIn Widgets
NetRatings SiteCensus
ScoreCard Research Beacon
Twitter Button
Tynt Insight
... just disabled Ghostery, and one of those is affecting the article content.
My guess is that Ghostery considers the javascript that is served by Twitter to be a tracking device (quite possibly correctly)... but I could be wrong.