Right: the one thing an LLM will never be able to do is stake their credibility ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		simonw 10 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: AI code review: Should the author be the reviewer? Right: the one thing an LLM will never be able to do is stake their credibility on the quality or accuracy of their output. I want another human to say "to the best of my knowledge this information is worth my time". Then if they waste my time I can pay them less attention in the future.

dakshgupta 10 months ago | [–]

This is a highly underrated point. It's the same reason AI might replace paralegals but won't replace lawyers.

recursive 10 months ago | [–]

They do this all the time. There's a reason we have the term "AI slop". LLM output definitely has a reputation.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact