Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think the numbers might be broken?

If it costs you 5000 kg of CO2 to manufacture the SSD, you will never recoup in operational terms no matter how it's sliced.

A modern NGCC power plant generates 400-500kg of CO2 per megawatt-hour of energy produced. It would take well over 100 years of operation to begin approaching this at a consumption level of ~10w.



I thought so too at first, but after a little bit of research, those really do appear to be the correct numbers. For instance, a detailed report [1] into one of Seagate's 1.92TB SSDs suggests that it consumed >200kg CO2 per TB. Eye-opening, really.

[1] https://www.seagate.com/files/www-content/global-citizenship...


One of the estimates my Solar system gives me is the amount of CO2 saved from using the system. I save about 6 Tonnes a year for having a 5.5KWp system. That is about 2.2 Tonnes of coal not burnt but its also only about 3 trees worth!

Its quite staggering the amount of CO2 our energy use is actually producing. KGs of CO2 for an items manufacture is pretty normal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: