Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's only one Jony Ive and alot of demand from the company with the deepest pockets in town ...

UX will make or break any major new AI product - especially hardware. The price is steep but I think it's actually a sensible move. There really aren't that many other people with the proven ability to deliver when it comes to UX at scale for novel areas.



Jony Ive is a designer verses Tony Fadell who is a hardware guy.

Ive is a very talented artist but AI is not being held back by people unwilling to courageously make things thinner and thinner.

I would imagine Ive looked at an Apple HomePod and thought “we could make this beautifully flat and hang it on the wall of every room in the house”. This might be a good idea but it in no way solves the major problems with AI/LLMs.


The same guy who designed the 2016 generation MacBooks and was kicked out of Apple over it?

Jony Ive is great at UX when someone like Steve Jobs is there to veto stupid ideas.


The first step in AI delivering a good UX might be coming up with a logo that doesn't look like a butthole. Unfortunately this seems to be an impossible task.


Only in silicon valley would $6,500,000,000 for a single designer seem like a sensible move...


It's not actually $6.5 billion cash. It's a stock certificate. A stock certificate which can go to zero.


> A stock certificate which can go to zero.

For whoever is holding the bag at the end of it all.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: