Is there a reason you didn’t explicitly pull in mkdocs as a dependency in that i... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		winterqt 6 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Fun with uv and PEP 723 Is there a reason you didn’t explicitly pull in mkdocs as a dependency in that invocation? I guess uv will expose it/let you run it anyways due to the fact that it’s required by everything else you did specify.

tfitz237 6 months ago [–]

its a `uvx` call, so the tool being invoked is `mkdocs`, and all the other dependencies are additions on top of that

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact