Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Virtually nobody said that it would go under in a year because that makes no sense. It's financially possible for it to tread water for years whilst losing money.

I don't see how this could be deemed a success when a magic 8 ball or a hamster attached to a giant pile of money could keep it going as long.



Lol the overwhelming tech jerk opinion was that he was firing elite engineers and the site would be unmaintainable as a result, and that he had over-leveraged himself to the point of bankruptcy.


He can't go bankrupt in any sane length of time whilst having the dragon hoard he has. I think you are cherry picking a few folks and assigning them the roles of "the public".

He's probably at more risk of falling out a window Soviet style than poverty.

It probably is unmaintainable but it was already feature complete at time of purchase.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: