> You completely blipped over the part about “no property rights” which is pretty clear when you look at, for example, how their rail construction projects go. Choochoo, rail is coming through, time to move this village
Better than exterminating the natives to build railroads? Using your logic we don't have property rights in the US either.
> If ownership of a half-finished concrete shell by a bankrupt construction firm on the 33rd floor is counted as “owning property”, then the statistics will look pretty good.
Yes. 1.4 billion people live in half-finished concrete shells.
Come up with something better. You guys are getting boring repeating the same nonsense over and over again.
Better than exterminating the natives to build railroads? Using your logic we don't have property rights in the US either.
> no eminent domain payments necessary.
Doesn't explain nail houses though.
https://www.cnn.com/2015/05/19/asia/gallery/china-nail-house...
> If ownership of a half-finished concrete shell by a bankrupt construction firm on the 33rd floor is counted as “owning property”, then the statistics will look pretty good.
Yes. 1.4 billion people live in half-finished concrete shells.
Come up with something better. You guys are getting boring repeating the same nonsense over and over again.