Come on, that's not enough. a) The parent said "taken straight from" but you've watered that down to "inspired by"; which is it? b) You've edited this post on HN, but the actual original article still makes no mention of the source.

Yep, fair enough. We've had contact with the post's publisher, and whilst it would be unfair of us to disclose the details of the communication, I've now updated the header text (to what I originally posted there when I first saw the root comment's allegation), and have down-weighted the post.