Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

“…the only thing it did was make it mandatory and unaffordable at the same time.”

That’s such a fraught statement, because the _opposite_ is claimed by supporters of the ACA after the repeal of the mandatory rule.

I’m old enough to remember the failed attempts for healthcare reforms under President Bill Clinton. The ACA felt like a miracle. It wasn’t what everyone wanted, but it was a start with principles. It has only been legislatively weakened over time, rather than improved.

Whatever alternative, employers should not be where we look for our healthcare. Can’t understand why anyone would trust their employer or expect good outcomes in the post-lifelong employment age.



>I’m old enough to remember the failed attempts for healthcare reforms under President Bill Clinton. The ACA felt like a miracle. It wasn’t what everyone wanted, but it was a start with principles. It has only been legislatively weakened over time, rather than improved.

I am also old enough to remember. And the health insurance companies spent heavily on lobbying and advertising ("death panels" and "healthcare rationing" and all sorts of other crap). It was sad.

Fast forward to the ACA and as I recall, insurers were spending USD1 million/day on lobbying efforts to block it.

I didn't think the ACA was a "miracle" though. Back then I used the analogy that it was like RFC 5386[0] ('Better Than Nothing Security'), as it wasn't single-payer and didn't even have a public option (thanks for nothing, Joe Lieberman -- I hope you're roasty-toasty in hell), but it was better than nothing.

I even have an ACA plan which costs me an enormous amount, but again, it's better than nothing.

[0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5386




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: