>... calling [something] [an inherently subjective term] is objectively...

Sorry, I don't follow. At any rate, you're replying to a post that gave object examples of things that actually happened, and you made not attempt to explain why the things the other person considered unreasonable are actually reasonable.

> calling it that as justification for cutting funding is meant as a justification for restricting free speech

Freedom of speech as a philosophical concept does not entail entitlement to funding, never mind 1A.