Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
stefan_
27 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
A faster heart for F-Droid
So that they can pay 100x more expenses for.. no gain? They would pay an arm just for traffic.
kevin_thibedeau
27 days ago
|
next
[–]
It's OpEx. MBAs will pour unlimited money into OpEx to avoid CapEx.
somehnguy
27 days ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Clearly I don't have an MBA because this mindset doesn't make sense to me. Burning money unnecessarily is burning money unnecessarily, no matter where it's burned.
arcfour
27 days ago
|
prev
[–]
CloudFlare is free/cheap and hey presto, no servers to manage!
herewulf
27 days ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
And when your Cloudflare site is down, most of the Internet is down too! There's no downside!
arcfour
27 days ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
That's true. It will be down much less often than a single server in someone's basement.
encrypted_bird
27 days ago
|
parent
|
prev
[–]
Counterpoint: that would require using CloudFlare.
arcfour
27 days ago
|
root
|
parent
[–]
That is, in my opinion, far superior to using a single server ran by "someone".
encrypted_bird
27 days ago
|
root
|
parent
[–]
I guess that is the beauty of opinions: they can be different from person to person. In my case, I would rather avoid CloudFlare if possible.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: