Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interesting paper. You might get more adoption if you remove the religious premise as the concepts can stand alone without theological underpinnings.




Thank you for the comment.

It would be dishonest (the intentional omission of relevant truthful fact) to not to disclose the source. If people already don't want the most important truth of all, the very one all of the others depend on always being true to then be true themselves, then they are already choosing to not adopt the truth into their lives and that is their choice. What they choose is not going to help me adopt it any more.

I understand your point, I hear all sorts of religious nonsense, but this is actually the real thing. Why blame the Lord: Truth and Life, for a bunch of people abusing his teachings to control and manipulate others? e.g. don't punish the innocent for the bad deeds and lies of many.

I wrote the paper. So, if I say that is my source, then anyone claiming otherwise must prove different.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: