Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But that would only hide the problem, doesn’t resolve the fact that models, in fact, violate copyright




That hasnt been established. Theres no concrete basis to assert that training violates copyright.

Everyone knows that what models do to obtain training data is not legal. We just need a very old system about copyright to catch up already so we can ban the practice.

"What they do to obtain" ah nice goal post shift.

When legally obtained, training is fine. Training doesnt violate copyright. Unauthorised copying and distribution does. Which is why OpenAI should have just paid for physical copies of all those books and scanned them.

>We just need a very old system about copyright to catch up already so we can ban the practice.

No we really don't need copyright to get worse. Its pretty damn harmful as it is.


True, but it would certainly reduce litigation risk in so much as copypasta is ipso facto proof of copyright violation.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: