This will be obliterated from this site (and I partially agree, there's nothing hacker-curiosity worthy in it).
The email reads weird. I'm not taking any sides obviously, it's just that bits like "your next career is rewarding" is not ... something you tell to the richest man in the world? There's no "next career" for them, lol. But who knows, maybe that's just how this guy writes.
Why? He obviously had ties to a LOT of wealthy and influential people - a lot of them in tech. There are often non tech things here. Like when some prince of Wales or something died. It had like 200 comments. Which I personally didn't understand because surely that is not tech related.
Anyway. How tech, wealth and politics are intertwined matters.
If nothing else, the epstein files have really opened my eyes to the rich and famous's complete disregard for spelling, capitalization, and punctuation.
"can you get me some anti-biotics, I've got an std from a russian child prostitute"
you can buy anti-biotics over the counter in plenty of places in the world
In 2000, a teenage kid name Raphael Gray made himself famous by hacking into some credit card records, ordering Viagra on Bill Gates personal credit card and having it delivered to Gates' home address.
Pretty sure bill gates is implicated based on other evidence.
It’s not so outlandish. If you got into trouble committing a crime you might go to the one who facilitated the crime for cleanup so as not to risk another co-conspirator.
1. Billionaires of all affiliations were enabled to go slumming and lots of people helped keep it quiet. Meanwhile, they were allowed to impregnate, infect, and wreck the mental health of thousands of children. Eww. Epstein's lengthy (but limited) survival may have been contingent on both the accumulation of kompromat on important people and the power/wealth halo effect.
2. Republican billionaires were almost certainly redacted in releases or withheld in documents not released.
3. I'm curious how many documents are/were incompletely redacted with filled rectangles rather than text removal such as using the Adobe tool. And, I wonder if any incomplete redactions are/were purposeful to leak while maintaining plausible deniability.
4. If/when Trump leaves office, with the behaviors exhibited thus far, it seems the remaining precious documents will go with him (or to his next of kin should he leave horizontally) to maintain power over others and that "victim security" is a duplicitous smokescreen.
> I wonder if any incomplete redactions are/were purposeful to leak
Yeah I’ve wondered this too. As dumb as some of the people doing redactions might be, I still think they would’ve learned from previous botched redactions that you can’t leave the real text underneath the black box. Unless they weren’t trying to.
The email reads weird. I'm not taking any sides obviously, it's just that bits like "your next career is rewarding" is not ... something you tell to the richest man in the world? There's no "next career" for them, lol. But who knows, maybe that's just how this guy writes.
reply