So what do you call it when you take a service and don't pay for the service? If you hire a lawyer but don't pay her for her time. If you hire a plumber but don't pay him for his time? A car mechanic? A doctor? A programmer? An artist?
I see that a programmer or artist is slightly different because the work the programmer or artist did can be duplicated where as the lawyer, plumber, doctor, car mechanic's work can not but they're still effectively the same. Someone worked and expects to be compensated for that work. Not compensating someone for work you received I believe is also called "theft".
I'll also note that the most pirated software often represents a lot more work than a single lawyer, plumber, doctor, car mechanic. If you use one of their services you'll likely get a few hours of their time. If you pirate photoshop or MW3 that likely represents a few hundred man years of time.
Anyway, I'm not arguing against piracy. I'm not sure what other word their is though for taking someone's time/labor without paying them.
>I see that a programmer or artist is slightly different because the work
the programmer or artist did can be duplicated.
That's not only "slightly different", that's the crucial difference. So
no, they aren't "effectively the same", they are two completely unrelated
cases. Would people please stop trying to use this dishonest and flat out
false argument to support entirely wrong chains of argumentation?
Besides which, the work an artist/programmer has done is unrelated to the
distribution of the result. If one expects to be paid for the actual work
done, they have to seek other models. One that often comes up here is
Kickstarter, where a form of contract is made - money for work done.
Perfectly fine. Musicians have and always had concerts and merchandise as
their source of income. Comissioned works are also possible, and are a
very valid source of income. Additionally, there's patronage - which is, for
example, basically the way Linus Torvalds makes his money.
I'm positive this list is by far not exhaustive.
So no, pirating something is not taking someone's work time, since their
time and money spend for distribution is effectively zero.
That might make it different than a plumber but how is that different than a lawyer or accountant. The result of their work is often just data. That data can be duplicated for free. By your argument I should therefore not have to pay them?
I'm not saying they are the same but I have yet to see someone clearly make the distinction on why one person's duplicate able work needed to be paid for and another's is not.
I see that a programmer or artist is slightly different because the work the programmer or artist did can be duplicated where as the lawyer, plumber, doctor, car mechanic's work can not but they're still effectively the same. Someone worked and expects to be compensated for that work. Not compensating someone for work you received I believe is also called "theft".
I'll also note that the most pirated software often represents a lot more work than a single lawyer, plumber, doctor, car mechanic. If you use one of their services you'll likely get a few hours of their time. If you pirate photoshop or MW3 that likely represents a few hundred man years of time.
Anyway, I'm not arguing against piracy. I'm not sure what other word their is though for taking someone's time/labor without paying them.