Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
bpicolo
on March 13, 2013
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
How We Went from 30 Servers to 2: Go
Well, more of the time it's because Ruby actually is, in fact, slow.
pjmlp
on March 13, 2013
|
next
[–]
I though the implementations were slow or fast, not the languages.
codygman
on March 13, 2013
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Typically a language is considered slow or fast based on it's most popular implementation, sadly.
ajanuary
on March 13, 2013
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
True, though language design can have implications on how fast things can be implemented.
pjmlp
on March 13, 2013
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Agreed, but it is still an implementation issue, because one can eventually discover ways to optimize such cases without changing the language.
sabat
on March 16, 2013
|
prev
[–]
Ruby is not, in fact, slow. This myth has been debunked so many times that I'll just leave the googling to you as an exercise.
Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch!
Applications
are open till July 27.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
