Probably not a huge concern, given the use case. Glacier is pretty fire-and-forget.
> It would also means constant replacement of disks.
They're already doing that with servers, why would disks be a problem?
Probably not a huge concern, given the use case. Glacier is pretty fire-and-forget.
> It would also means constant replacement of disks.
They're already doing that with servers, why would disks be a problem?