For me, this redirects to: http://www.sexarchive.info/GESUND/ARCHIV/GUS/HISTORYCHHS.HTM

Which is blocked at my workplace. So, possible NSFW?

Same here. Anyone has any idea what this article is about?

Looks like scholarly work, not exactly Playboy stuff. Title and table of contents:

Growing Up Sexually

World Reference Atlas (Oct., 2002)

[to Atlas Index]

[to Main Index]

Janssen, D. F. (Oct., 2002). Growing Up Sexually. Volume I: World Reference Atlas.

Interim report. Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Europe, Historical Generalia [National and Historical Specifics in a Europe Chapter]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contents of Section

Europe, Historical Generalia.. 1

Introduction: Histories of Childhood 1

Some Previous Notes and Localisations 2

Intermezzo: Albert Moll 3

Ancient Romans and Greek 3

Age of Marriage 3

Greek Love with a Specific Reference to Age 4

Middle Ages 6

The Puberty Experience 6

Medieval Childhood Sexuality: Some Fragments 7

Puberty, Marriage and Coitarche 8

Medieval and Renaissance Age-Structured Patterns 9

Medieval "Genital Parenting" 10

Child Witches 10

The Paradoxic Loves of Geniuses 11

The Masturbation Paradigm: "Onanopathies", the Early, and Very Early 12

Medical Curricularisation: Paradoxia Sexualis and the Developmentalisation of Impulses 13

Additional Reading: Europe, History 13

Index to Section: History of Europe 14

Notes

Looks like some sort of encyclopedia-style article about the history of child and adolescent sexuality in Europe. I'm not sure why it's here.

The citation: Janssen, D. F. (Oct., 2002). Growing Up Sexually. Volume I: World Reference Atlas. Interim report. Amsterdam, The Netherlands

It's here because gwern.

It's just one chapter/section of a larger work. Not at all sure why it's here.

What I found interesting is how different it is from the idealized picture of a chaste moral past a lot of people would like to believe in, and how different societies can treat the process of sexualization.

Cool! thanks for the reply!

It does seem scholarly and also quite interesting.