The full text of the option that won, since the results mail doesn't include it:
"The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of the vote.
Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the procedures for decision making and conflict resolution are working adequately and thus a General Resolution is not required."
The graphical results (rendered from the graphviz at the end of the voting results mail) show the full preferences of the project:
A labeled edge from A to B in that graph means that voters preferred A to B by that margin.
Those results answer several questions, in addition to the clear statement in the GR text above. In particular, it's clear that 1) people consider any result preferable to further discussion (just barely in the case of mandatory support for other init systems), 2) people still consider it desirable to support other init systems, just not mandatory, and 3) people would rather see a definitive statement in favor of systemd dependencies than a definitive statement against them.
"The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of the vote.
Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the procedures for decision making and conflict resolution are working adequately and thus a General Resolution is not required."
The graphical results (rendered from the graphviz at the end of the voting results mail) show the full preferences of the project:
https://twitter.com/josh_triplett/status/534870813863051264
A labeled edge from A to B in that graph means that voters preferred A to B by that margin.
Those results answer several questions, in addition to the clear statement in the GR text above. In particular, it's clear that 1) people consider any result preferable to further discussion (just barely in the case of mandatory support for other init systems), 2) people still consider it desirable to support other init systems, just not mandatory, and 3) people would rather see a definitive statement in favor of systemd dependencies than a definitive statement against them.